Needles in a haystack

Abstract

In the late 1960s, an Air France pilot and his family took a holiday in swampy Louisiana in the southeastern USA and were intrigued by the giant bullfrogs, Rana catesbeiana . The family introduced a dozen of the animals to a pond in the Bordeaux region of southwestern France, inadvertently starting a major invasion that affected thousands of lakes and creeks with devastating effects on the native fauna. “They eat everything and if you go to a pond where there are bullfrogs, there are no other amphibians […] because bullfrogs prey on other animals or because they are spreading a disease—chytridiomycosis—that is absent from some European areas,” said conservation biologist Francesco Ficetola of the Department of Environmental Sciences at the University of Milano–Bicocca in Italy. “There was nothing like them in Europe,” he added. As part of his postdoctoral research, Ficetola studied the frog invasion in Europe at the Universite de Savoie and the University of Grenoble in France. To monitor their distribution, he pioneered the use of environmental DNA (eDNA) to detect R. catesbeiana without observing the animals themselves. He and his colleagues took water samples, extracted eDNA and used primers monomorphic to nearly 400 bullfrog samples to demonstrate their presence in wetlands, even in low densities. ![][1] “The significance was that we were able to detect the presence of the species without seeing or hearing the species,” Ficetola said. The eDNA technique has further potential: “As the environment can retain the molecular imprint of inhabiting species, our approach allows the reliable detection of secretive organisms in wetlands without direct observation. Combined with massive sequencing and the development of DNA barcodes that enable species identification, this approach opens new perspectives for the assessment of current biodiversity from environmental samples” (Ficetola et al , 2008). According to David Lodge, a biologist … [1]: /embed/graphic-1.gif