Abstract
This article, after deliberating on utility of performance evaluation (PE) for the judiciary and practices developed in different jurisdictions for PE, examines existing rules on PE of magistrates in India. From these rules, effectiveness and utility of criteria formulated for PE of magistrates by different high courts is mapped to show their shortcomings, and suggestions are provided for improvement. The article relies on the results of a survey among 35 senior district judges to understand how evaluators see their role in the PE. In the end, some suggestions are offered for reforming the existing system of PE – like delinking it from annual confidential reports, establishing independent commission for PE, adopting transparency in PE, widening gap between two evaluations and making PE as a deciding factor for upward career mobility of magistrates.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
