Need for advanced cardiac life-support training in rural, community hospitals

Abstract

To define the relative needs of the staffs of rural, community hospitals for training in advanced cardiac life support (ACLS), identify weaknesses, and modify a standard ACLS course to meet these needs. Prospective assessment of knowledge and skills relating to the practice of ACLS. Rural, community hospitals in southern Wisconsin. None. A well-validated, multiple-option, precourse test for life-support knowledge and clinical judgment was administered to the staff nurses, respiratory therapists, and practicing physicians of 12 rural, community hospitals in southern Wisconsin before their participation in a modified, extended, ACLS course, using the pre-1992 American Heart Association standards and guidelines. Testing was accomplished over 4 yrs. Detailed item analysis of the test was performed. A total of 461 persons participated. Overall, physicians performed better (p < .001) than did the nurses. Precourse difficulties included electrocardiographic rhythm strip interpretation, particularly with identification of the atrioventricular (A-V) blocks. Only 39.6% of the nurses and 64.1% of the physicians correctly identified third-degree A-V block. One third of the nurses and 22% of the physicians did not correctly identify coarse ventricular fibrillation. The pharmacologic properties and utility of atropine and epinephrine were not understood. Propranolol was selected for treatment of third-degree A-V block by 31.6% and 22.8% of the nurses and the physicians, respectively. Neither group was able to accurately distinguish between the components of disturbances in acid-base balance. The esophageal obturator airway tube was not a familiar tool to any of the groups. No improvement in overall performance on pretests occurred across the calendar years of the study. There is a need for ACLS training in community hospitals. Educational programs for physicians and staffs should be designed to meet that need.