Abstract

Following our recent work on Type II supernovae (SNe), we present a set of 1D nonlocal thermodynamic equilibrium radiative transfer calculations for nebular-phase Type Ibc SNe starting from state-of-the-art explosion models with detailed nucleosynthesis. Our grid of progenitor models is derived from He stars that were subsequently evolved under the influence of wind mass loss. These He stars, which most likely form through binary mass exchange, synthesize less oxygen than their single-star counterparts with the same zero-age main sequence (ZAMS) mass. This reduction is greater in He-star models evolved with an enhanced mass loss rate. We obtain a wide range of spectral properties at 200 d. In models from He stars with an initial mass > 6 M⊙, the [O I] λλ 6300, 6364 is of a comparable or greater strength than [Ca II] λλ 7291, 7323 – the strength of [O I] λλ 6300, 6364 increases with the He-star initial mass. In contrast, models from lower mass He stars exhibit a weak [O I] λλ 6300, 6364, strong [Ca II] λλ 7291, 7323, and also strong N II lines and Fe II emission below 5500 Å. The ejecta density, which is modulated by the ejecta mass, the explosion energy, and clumping, has a critical impact on gas ionization, line cooling, and spectral properties. We note that Fe II dominates the emission below 5500 Å and is stronger at earlier nebular epochs. It ebbs as the SN ages, while the fractional flux in [O I] λλ 6300, 6364 and [Ca II] λλ 7291, 7323 increases with a similar rate as the ejecta recombine. Although the results depend on the adopted wind mass loss rate and pre-SN mass, we find that He-stars of 6–8 M⊙ initially (ZAMS mass of 23–28 M⊙) match the properties of standard SNe Ibc adequately. This finding agrees with the offset in progenitor masses inferred from the environments of SNe Ibc relative to SNe II. Our results for less massive He stars are more perplexing since the predicted spectra are not seen in nature. They may be missed by current surveys or associated with Type Ibn SNe in which interaction power dominates over decay power.

Highlights

  • Recent developments with the nonlocal thermodynamic equilibrium radiative transfer code CMFGEN (Hillier & Dessart 2012) have led to a better numerical stability in the steady-state solver and a more suitable treatment of chemical mixing in corecollapse supernova (SN) ejecta (Dessart & Hillier 2020a,b)

  • Following our previous work (Dessart et al 2021) on the nebularphase properties of Type II SNe arising from the explosion of stars that evolved in isolation at solar metallicity and died as red supergiants (Sukhbold et al 2016), we here undertake a study of a similar nature based on the He-star explosion models of Ertl et al (2020), with the pre-SN evolution described in Woosley (2019)

  • The radiative transfer performed with CMFGEN (Hillier & Miller 1998; Hillier & Dessart 2012) is carried out with the approach described in Dessart & Hillier (2020a)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent developments with the nonlocal thermodynamic equilibrium (nonLTE) radiative transfer code CMFGEN (Hillier & Dessart 2012) have led to a better numerical stability in the steady-state solver and a more suitable treatment of chemical mixing in corecollapse supernova (SN) ejecta (Dessart & Hillier 2020a,b). The underlying assumption is that such He stars formed initially from the prompt removal of the H-rich envelope through binary mass exchange, probably as the star first expanded following the ignition of hydrogen burning in a shell (case B mass transfer) This scenario is thought to be responsible for most of the observed Type Ibc SNe and is distinct from the single-star evolution that may produce most of the observed SNe II. Ms taken from the single-star explosion models of Woosley & Heger (2007) and subsequently trimmed to retain only the innermost layer of the H-rich envelope This approach is not suitable for SNe Ibc for which the combined effects of binary-mass transfer and Wolf-Rayet wind mass loss appear essential (Podsiadlowski et al 1992; Eldridge et al 2008; Yoon et al 2010; Yoon 2017; Woosley 2019; Dessart et al 2020). Supplementary tables and figures are provided in the appendix to complement the information given in the main text

He-star models
Preparation of models for radiative-transfer simulations using CMFGEN
Radiative transfer calculations with CMFGEN
General properties
Salient differences between nebular spectra of
Sensitivity to the ejecta density structure
Uniform clumping throughout the ejecta
Uniform clumping limited to O-rich material
Simple velocity scaling
Physically consistent models with half and twice the Ekin of model he4p5
Impact of pre-SN mass loss
The positron contribution to the SN luminosity
10. Evolution until late times
12.1. SN 1993J
12.3. SN 2007C
12.2. SN 2011dh
12.4. SN 2004aw
12.5. SN 2007gr and SN 2013ge
Findings
13. Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call