Abstract

We analyze the finite-sample behavior of three second-order bias-corrected alternatives to the maximum likelihood estimator of the parameters that index the beta distribution. The three finite-sample corrections we consider are the conventional second-order bias corrected estimator (Cordeiro et al ., 1997), the alternative approach introduced by Firth (1993) and the bootstrap bias correction. We present numerical results comparing the performance of these estimators for thirty-six different values of the parameter vector. Our results reveal that analytical bias corrections considerably outperform numerical bias corrections obtained from bootstrapping schemes.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.