Abstract

Abstract Light emitted from Venus’s surface can be viewed through spectral “windows” in its atmosphere, in the near-infrared (NIR) around 1000 nanometer (nm) wavelengths. The NIR emissivity of Venus’s surface can constrain rock types and their weathering state; emissivities can be measured directly or calculated from reflectances. We measured the reflectances of igneous and sedimentary rocks at Venus’s surface temperature, 400 °C–500 °C at 850 and 950 nm; samples were heated in a box furnace in air, illuminated by light-emitting diodes (LEDs), and imaged with a modified charge-coupled device (CCD) camera. Reflectances were also measured at 25 °C from 350 to 1400 nm. Rock reflectances at 850 and 950 nm and 400 °C–500 °C are nearly identical to those at 25 °C, except for the effects of nanophase hematite forming on some surfaces. Fresh basalts have reflectances (high and low temperatures) near 7.5%; a leucogranite similarly has reflectances near 50%. Pigmentary hematite has nearly identical reflectances at high- and low-temperature at these wavelengths. Pigmentary hematite appears dark brown 400 °C–500 °C because its absorption edge has shifted to beyond the limit of human vision. These rock reflectances imply that basalts should have emissivities near 0.9, and granite (and similar felsic rocks) should have lower emissivities ∼0.5. Thus, basalt and felsic rock should be easily distinguished in NIR emissivity measurements of Venus’s surface, such as are baselined in recent Venus mission proposals. Other sedimentary rocks should have even lower emissivities: quartz sand at around ∼0.3, and anhydrite as low as 0.1.

Highlights

  • Most we know about the surface of Venus comes from radar data, both from Earth and from orbit (Ivanov & Head 2011; Taylor et al 2018); this is because Venus’s thick clouds are opaque to most wavelengths of light, ultraviolet through infrared

  • Broken, uncut surface exposures of a sedimentary rock and a range of igneous rocks types that span the full range of compositions possible on Venus

  • The camera had been modified commercially to restore the sensitivity of its charge-coupled device (CCD) image plane to NIR light

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Most we know about the surface of Venus comes from radar data, both from Earth and from orbit (Ivanov & Head 2011; Taylor et al 2018); this is because Venus’s thick clouds are opaque to most wavelengths of light, ultraviolet through infrared. Mountains around the edges of Ishtar Terra have radar emissivities and reflectances far outside the norm for Venus, and these have been interpreted as surface deposits of iron oxides (Pettengill et al 1988; Semprich et al 2020), iron sulfides (Klose et al 1992; Wood 1997), or frosts of metals or chalcogenides (Brackett et al 1995; Pettengill et al 1996; Schaefer & Fegley 2004). Emissivities of basaltic rock in the wavelength range of the atmospheric “windows,” 0.85–1.2 μm, have recently been reported to be >0.95 at Venus’s surface temperatures (Dyar et al.2017, 2019b, 2019a, 2020, 2021; Helbert et al 2017a; Dyar 2019) which are (to first order) consistent with the room-temperature NIR reflectance values. Do rock reflectances change significantly between 25 °C and ∼470 °C, the temperature of Venus’s surface? Is Kirchoff’s law applicable to the materials and temperatures found at Venus’s surface?

Samples
Methods
Results
Implications
Venus’s NIR Reflectances
Hematite on Venus’s Surface
Image Acquisition
Camera Calibration
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call