Abstract
The kinetics of forming all possible single base substitution errors are measured for Drosophila melanogaster DNA polymerase alpha and avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase. Seventeen sites along bacteriophage M13 DNA are investigated so that effects of nearest neighbor base stacking on misinsertion kinetics can be evaluated. Polymerase alpha appears to be more error prone than reverse transcriptase. Polymerase alpha forms transversion mispairs at rates comparable to transition mispairs with two exceptions; A.A and C.C are formed with significantly higher and lower efficiencies, respectively. Reverse transcriptase forms transversions with lower efficiencies than transitions, especially low being A.G, G.G, and C.C. For both enzymes, misinsertion frequencies vary typically by 10-fold for the same mispair in different locations. Misinsertion frequency can be expressed as a product of two components, one based on Km and the other on Vmax. DNA polymerase alpha appears to use primarily Km discrimination (100-5000-fold) to achieve insertion fidelity while reverse transcriptase shows a greater balance between Km and Vmax discrimination. Nearest-neighbor base stacking interactions appear to have opposite effects on the two discrimination components. The 5'-nearest neighbor influence on Km is greater for correct insertions than for incorrect, while the influence on Vmax is greater for the incorrect base. Target sites that have pyrimidine as the 5'-nearest neighbor to incoming nucleotides show a higher than average misinsertion component based on Km, but a lower than average component based on Vmax. Conversely, target sites with nearest neighbor purines have a higher than average Vmax component. These results imply that nucleotide misinsertion "hot spots" will occur next to pyrimidines when Km discrimination is dominant and next to purines when Vmax discrimination is dominant. When Vmax and Km discrimination components have similar magnitudes, nearest neighbor effects tend to cancel thereby reducing the effects of base stacking on insertion error rates.
Highlights
The kinetics of forming all possible single base sub- locus (1).DNAslippage is an example of a physical event stitution errors aremeasured for Drosophila melano- wherein displacement of DNA strands relative to each other gaster DNA polymerase a and avian myeloblastosis can serve as a source of single base substitutions (2) as well virus reverse transcriptaseS. eventeen sites along bac- as frameshift mutations(3, 4)
Target sites that havepyrimidine as the 5”nearest neighbor to incoming nucleotides show a higher than average misinsertion component based on K, but a lower than average component based on V
To investigate the biochemical basis for base substitution “hot” and “cold” spots, we measure the kinetics of primer extension at selected sites by electrophoretic assay of extended primers (15,16)H. ere we report the results of studying the misinsertion properties of two polymerases, Drosophila Pol
Summary
The mean K , discrimination start sites, we evaluate the geometric mean of the component values ~ran)ge 80-1,500 and 190-1,000 for AMV RT and for each mispair at different sites and thenevaluate the ratio Pol a, respectively. The mainly K, discrimination to select against incoming mispairs, ratio offK to f is either greater or less than 1.Values greater and that AMV R T shows much more V,,, discrimination than one indicate the incorrect base is misinserted more than Pol a while maintaining a similar K, discrimination. By plotting the Misinsertion Hot Spots and Cold Spots-The ratios (fK/fK ratio, fK/fK, for each mispair with respect to the 5”nearest and fv/fv) for each 5”nearest neighbor show a dependence neighbor at theinsertion site (Fig. 4), any systematic nearest- on ?K and ?v.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.