Near‐Peer Created Videos: A Valuable Tool in Focusing Student Learning in the Gross Anatomy Laboratory

Abstract

Near‐peer teachers continue to be a significant driving force behind curricular changes that provide anatomy instruction to meet the needs of students in the current learning environment. Near‐peer teaching assistants (TAs) are important contributors in the facilitation of Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, anatomy course. The team‐based design of this course incorporates various approaches to team oriented activities, including introduction to radiology and ultrasound education and whole body dissections. TAs are equally involved in delivery of briefing sessions, prosections, guidance of student dissections, and review sessions. While students acknowledge educational benefits of learning anatomy through dissection, many still experience challenges in effectively using combined classical resources such as dissection manuals, textbooks, atlases, and various computer‐assisted tools. To enhance student competency in dissection as well as to maintain curricular alignment between clinically oriented course content and dissection goals often different than what is presented in dissection manuals or commercially available videos, TAs dissected a cadaver and created short videos. Videos outlined necessary steps for the assigned dissection, identified challenging aspects of dissection procedure, and provided review of clinically relevant anatomic structures. Videos were filmed daily by TAs using commercially available iPads or iPhones and edited using iMovie software. All videos were uploaded to Blackboard curriculum management system the day before dissection and remained accessible to students throughout the course. The objective of this study was to determine medical student satisfaction and utilization of near‐peer created teaching videos for preparation and guidance of laboratory dissection. A total of 28 videos were created that ran from approximately 2 to 13 min in duration. Viewing data for the videos was tracked on the server and a survey was distributed to the students after the final examination (IRB protocol #17‐009090). Response rate was 91% (48 of 53 students responded to the survey). The survey used a five‐point Likert scale in which 1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree. In general, students found the videos useful in their preparation for laboratory dissection. They agreed that they frequently used the videos to prepare for the assigned dissection (4.74) and they felt that videos improved their efficiency (4.73) and confidence (4.45) in the laboratory. Additionally, 47% of students ranked the videos as their primary resource for dissection preparation. Near‐peer created videos provide an inexpensive and effective alternative to commercially available products. In addition, these videos allow facilitators to relate course specific material with dissection goals, advance self‐directed learning, and help students overcome the challenge of potential cognitive overload from the need to consult too many references within a short timeframe of the dissection laboratory.This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.