Abstract

Current assessment standards for peripheral arterial disease (PAD), such as the ankle brachial index, are limited in their utility and portability. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) has shown some promise in diagnosing PAD when used in conjunction with a provocative maneuver. The purpose of this study was to assess the viability of NIRS in conjunction with a transient leg elevation provocative maneuver for detecting severe PAD. This retrospective observational cross-sectional study assessed 57 limbs in 34 patients receiving routine vascular screening for PAD at Madigan Army Medical Center. The patient limbs were stratified into normal (n = 17), mild (n = 9), moderate (n = 16), and severe (n = 15) PAD groups based on the clinician assessments. Additionally, the patients were assessed with NIRS measurements taken with the patient in the supine position at rest and using a provocative leg raise maneuver of transient leg elevation of 45° for 60 seconds. The resting tissue oxygen saturation (StO2) and the change in StO2 (ΔStO2) from rest to elevation were recorded and compared between the PAD severity groups via independent measures analysis of variance with the Tukey honest significant difference post hoc test. The supine resting StO2 was not different between the normal (77.5% ± 7.7%), mild (72.5% ± 7.4%), moderate (72.0% ± 10.3%), and severe (74.2% ± 5.4%) PAD groups (P = .23). However, the ΔStO2 with transient leg elevation was significantly greater in the severe PAD group (−17.2% ± 6.0%) compared with the normal (−3.9% ± 4.8%), mild (−6.9% ± 4.7%), and moderate (−9.7% ± 5.2%) PAD groups (P < .002 for all). Similar results were observed in the changes in oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin. The leg elevation protocol was also used for two patients before and after lower limb revascularization, which demonstrated that the ΔStO2 corresponded with the clinical assessment of PAD severity. Resting supine NIRS images were unable to detect any differences among normal and limbs with different PAD severity. However, NIRS imaging with 45° leg elevation for 60 seconds showed a significant difference between severe PAD compared healthy patients and those with mild to moderate PAD in a fast, precise, and accurate manner. These preliminary data support the use of NIRS and transient leg elevation as a tool to diagnose severe PAD but do not support the use of NIRS alone as a screening test for PAD. NIRS measurements with leg elevation might be a viable noninvasive, noncontact, and portable method of assessing severe PAD for home monitoring, in rural communities, and/or in standard clinical practice.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call