Abstract
This paper investigates the buoyancy effect on near-field evolution of triple equal starting thermal plumes from volumetric heat sources, with a focus on merging process, velocity evolution, and stream-wise penetration. Instantaneous velocity fields and corresponding vorticity distribution, temporal evolution of centerline axial velocities, temporal penetrating rates and heights are examined by 2-D particle image velocimetry (PIV) at three different source heat strengths of 180W, 90W, and 30W.A four-stage merging process is demonstrated to be independent of heat strength. Normalized starting and terminating times of each developing stage are also unified regardless of the heat strength, i.e., t/t∗=1.7–2.5 for stage i (relatively isolated development), t/t∗=2.5–3.3 for stage ii (bending wall flows), t/t∗=3.3–3.9 for stage iii (development after a self-merged state), and t/t∗ > 3.9 for stage iv (evolution with global merging).The axial velocity at a specific centerline point usually involves three distinct developing periods: a “centerline-silent” period ending at a normalized transportation time tt_n when heat is just transported to the measuring points, a fast rising period, and a fluctuating period starting at a normalized endurance time te_n. The buoyancy-independent tt_n is approximately 1.5, 2.2, 3.0, and 3.2 at a normalized downstream distance of 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, and 4.5, respectively. The time te_n, independent of buoyancy and axial height, is about 3.6 for all measuring points in this study.The maximum axial velocity above the middle heat source exhibits three linearly developing periods with different acceleration rates successively: a quicker rate as the wall flow develops, a slower rate due to enhanced lateral interaction, and the fastest rate as the global merging happens. In different periods, the proportional coefficients of linear fitted functions vary from 0.48 to 2.98. The downstream distance where axial velocity is maximum shows similar power-law increasing during t/t∗=1.5–3.2 at Q=180 and 90W, but exhibits significant fluctuations at Q=30W. Normalized overall penetration based on global velocity fields is notably faster and higher at the lowest buoyancy (Q=30W) than that at the higher buoyancy (Q=180 and 90W), probably due to the weaker lateral interaction and turbulent mixing together with the more dedicated vertical rise at Q=30W.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.