NE Atlantic break-up: a re-examination of the Iceland mantle plume model and the Atlantic–Arctic linkage

Abstract

Final break-up of Pangaea – opening of the NE Atlantic (NEA) and the Arctic Eurasia Basin – was associated with significant magmatism (in the NEA) and is commonly ascribed to thermal effects from a proto-Iceland plume. The plume is often assumed to be fixed with respect to the Earth’s core and to have governed NEA break-up. It is argued here that the Iceland anomaly, past and present, cannot represent a fixed plume, nor be rooted at the core–mantle boundary and that the Greenland–Faroes Ridge is inconsistent with a classic time-transgressive hotspot track. It is shown that the Iceland anomaly has probably been located at the constructive plate boundary (Mid-Atlantic Ridge and antecedents) since its inception. While recent studies allow for some ‘wandering’ of hotspots relative to the core and mantle, it is considered unlikely that such drift of a mantle plume would precisely match lithospheric drift in order to achieve constant centering on the spreading ridge. The alternative view is, therefore, supported – that the anomaly is an upper mantle response to plate break-up. The two pulses of NEA magmatism are related to separate phases of North Atlantic break-up. Early Paleocene magmatism ( c . 62–58 Ma) was governed by a short-lived attempt at seeking a new rift path, intermediate in time and space between the Labrador Sea–Baffin Bay and the NEA–Eurasia Basin rifts. The voluminous Early Eocene magmatism ( c . 56–53 Ma) along the NEA margins was related to final break-up of Pangaea, exploiting the collapsed Caledonian fold belt. The interpretations here are at odds with Iceland representing a classic Morgan-type plume and it is suggested that the magmatism in the NEA and the Iceland anomaly represent a ‘top-down’ effect of plate tectonics.