NCMP-01. EARLY RECURRENCE OF GLIOBLASTOMA MULTIFORM INVOLVING MULTIPLE BRAIN REGIONS ASSOCIATED WITH MUTATIONS IN EXON 4 OF ISOCITRATE DEHYDROGENASE 1 COMPLICATED BY GADOLINIUM-INDUCED ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE: A CASE REPORT

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma multiform (GBM) remains one of the most aggressive primary brain tumors with high recurrence rates. Case presentation We present a case of a 43-year-old female, Yira, diagnosed with early recurrence of GBM involving multiple brain regions, accompanied by mutations in exon 4 of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1), a marker associated with poor prognosis. Additionally, this case was complicated by gadolinium-induced acute kidney failure on postoperative day 3. The patient initially presented with progressive neurological symptoms, including headache and cognitive decline. Multiplanar multiecho MRI of the brain was performed with IV contrast in orthogonal plane and revealed a moderate sized multilobulated heterogeneously and predominantly peripherally enhancing mass lesion with irregular margins and central non enhancing areas of necrosis arising from the right corona radiata, insular cortex, external capsule, lentiform nucleus, temporal, and frontal white matter with blood products. Perilesional edema was seen. Effacement of sulcal spaces. Right sylvian fissure, compression over right ventricle and midline shift of 8mm toward left side. There was dilatation of the left lateral ventricle with periventricular cerebrospinal fluid ooze. Uncal herniation was right side. On MR spectroscopy large choline, creatinine levels were seen in the lesion with reduced N-acetyl aspartate levels as compared to the normal parenchyma. Findings were suggestive of neoplastic lesion mostly high-grade glioma. Polymerase chain reaction sequencing confirmed missense mutation R132H in exon 4 of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 gene. Despite maximal safe surgical resection, the patient developed recurrent GBM within three months, with gadolinium-based contrast agent exposure leading to acute kidney injury. CONCLUSION The combination of aggressive tumor behavior and complications from contrast agent administration highlights the challenges in managing recurrent GBM. This case underscores the importance of vigilant monitoring for complications in GBM patients, particularly those with IDH1 mutations, and the need for further research into novel therapeutic strategies.