Abstract

Contrary to the ‘rupture thesis’ favoured in Anglo-American academic discourse, Nazi criminal law did not emerge from a vacuum; nor did it disappear after 1945. The article explains and defends this ‘continuity thesis’. In fact, Nazi criminal law adopted earlier authoritarian tendencies of German criminal law and exacerbated them (the ‘radicalisation thesis’). It is for this reason that Nazi criminal law should not lightly be dismissed as ‘non-law’, thus omitting any further engagement with it. The article will show that the same continuity and radicalisation arguments can be made, mutatis mutandis, for German Nazi criminology, which ultimately became a legitimating science (‘Legitimationswissenschaft’) for Nazi criminal justice policy. The argument is developed in four stages. First, an account is given of the racist and criminal-biologistic foundations of National Socialist criminology, including their continuity both with the past and into the future. This is followed by an explanation of the influence of criminal anthropology (particularly that of Lombroso) on the ‘scientification’ of criminology (the ‘Kraepelin and Aschaffenburg paradigms’). Third, the National Socialist radicalisation of criminology on the basis of the criminal-biological utopia of the ‘blood-based’ Volksgemeinschaft is described. Thus, Nazi criminology derived its strength from and built upon biological theories of crime, which in turn laid the foundations of the deadly Nazi criminal justice policy. The discipline became a science that legitimated National Socialism, contrary to Wetzell's thesis of a somewhat dissident ‘mainstream criminology’. With regard to disturbing developments in current German politics, all this will make clear that the approach of the (German) ‘New Right’ to criminal justice is not novel at all but is derived from the ideologically infused theories and policies of Nazi criminologists during the 1930s.

Highlights

  • During the Nazi era (1933–45), German criminal law assumed a very different character, moulded by the regime’s ideology.[1]

  • Nazi criminology derived its strength from and built upon biological theories of crime, which in turn laid the foundations of the deadly Nazi criminal justice policy

  • Against this background, is it possible to say that mainstream criminology during the Nazi period – in clear distinction to Nazi criminology – rejected racial-genetic determinism à la Ritter and adhered to an interaction involving predisposition and environment – as least as a theoretical starting point?180 Wetzell argues along these lines, claiming that while National Socialism needed research in criminal biology to support its eugenic and biologistic views, mainstream criminology provided only limited support for these ideas,[181] as ‘genetically deterministic and racist explanations of crime did not predominate in criminal biology and criminology’, and ‘mainstream criminology ... was characterized by a continuing process of increasing methodological sophistication’

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

During the Nazi era (1933–45), German criminal law assumed a very different character, moulded by the regime’s ideology.[1]. Konzepte und praktische Durchführung eines Ansatzes zur Erfassung von Kriminalität’ in Justizministerium NRW, Juristische Zeitgeschichte Band 6 (Justizministerium des Landes NRW 1997) 69, 71; Wetzell (n 17) 10, 15–17, 125–42; Müller (n 32) 150–58, 171–75, 206–23 (on eugenic approaches in the German Empire and the Weimar Republic), 273–89, 296–302 (racist traditions); Imanuel Baumann, Dem Verbrechen auf der Spur (Wallstein 2006) 35–42, 55–89 (especially references to the debate on racial hygiene and sterilisation at 51, 77–89), 364; Menne (n 32) 17–30, 31–54 (‘biology of physical constitution’ [‘Konstitutionsbiologie’]), 71–102 (‘genetic biology’ [‘Erbbiologie’]); Berg (n 20) 79–106; on the history of criminal biology since antiquity, Nadine Hohlfeld, Moderne Kriminalbiologie (Lang 2002) 23–44; see Streng (n 20) 143; Fedja Alexander Hilliger, Das Rechtsdenken Karl Bindings und die ‘Freigabe der Vernichtung lebensunwerten Lebens‘ (Duncker & Humblot 2018) 293–300. With his reference to Exner, Mezger ‘shattered the overly narrow framework of old-style criminal biology’ (‘allzu enge[n] Rahmen einer Kriminalbiologie alten Stils gesprengt’: ibid). ibid 7

EFFECTS OF CRIMINAL ANTHROPOLOGY
MAINSTREAM AND NAZI CRIMINOLOGY?
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call