Abstract
Three experiments explored aspects of virtual reality (VR) that may influence its utility for training in navigating architectural spaces. Taken together, these experiments suggest that the utility of virtual reality depends on characteristics of the user-virtual environment interface. In experiments testing the importance of movement control, full participant control of rotational and forward movement in VR led to nearly optimal training on a medium-sized building, but limited control in VR was worse than no control. Transparent walls, a VR possibility that goes beyond real-world options, were beneficial during training and on a direct measure of learning spatial layouts. Finally, in an experiment examining both training and transfer, VR training was similar to real-world training, and was quicker and transferred better to navigating a real-world building than floor-plan training. However, this held only when the testing route was traveled in the trained direction.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.