Abstract

Technological innovations have created a significant shift in how investment information is created, disseminated, and reviewed. Social media platforms and other internet-based information intermediaries are now important sources of fundamental investment analysis for investors. We use an experiment to examine how investors use features of social media platforms—specifically, network oversight, contributor publication experience, and contributor ownership status—to assess contributor credibility and make investment judgments. Consistent with satisficing theory, we find the presence of one positive credibility cue is sufficient to increase investor perceptions of contributor credibility and willingness to invest. However, once a positive credibility cue is present, additional credibility cues have little influence on investors’ judgments. Our findings have important implications for investors, social media platforms, and regulators, providing evidence on how investors assess credibility for an important new information intermediary and when investors’ judgments are likely to be influenced.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.