Abstract
The patent laws of both China and the United States have joint infringement and indirect infringement doctrines, and both countries obey territoriality principles in applying intellectual property rights (IPRs). These doctrines and principles, however, are construed and applied differently on the two sides of the Pacific. This Article compares and contrasts the two legal regimes and identifies potentially significant gaps in patent coverage for patented but divisible systems that are practiced in separate legal jurisdictions.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
