Year-end Sale % OFF 
Abstract
AbstractIn cross‐border insolvency cases involving foreign liquidators, Hong Kong courts traditionally adhered to two criteria for recognition and assistance: the collective nature of insolvency proceedings and the commencement of such proceedings in the company's place of incorporation. This approach has evolved following Re Global Brands, marking a shift towards considering the company's COMI as a more practical criterion, and highlighting the impracticalities of using the place of incorporation as the primary criterion. Despite the benefits, the COMI Criterion introduces complexities, such as potential non‐recognition and conflicting rulings between jurisdictions. There are also questions surrounding the differences between the principle of modified universalism under common law and the UNCITRAL Model Law. This article analyses the impacts brought about by the transition to the COMI Criterion, and encourages consideration of the adoption of the Model Law by Hong Kong in the future.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
