Abstract
Facial recognition technologies (FRTs) are used by law enforcement agencies (LEAs) for various purposes, including public security, as part of their legally mandated duty to serve the public interest. While these technologies can aid LEAs in fulfilling their public security responsibilities, they pose significant risks to data protection rights. This article identifies four specific risks associated with the use of FRT by LEAs for public security within the frameworks of the General Data Protection Regulation and Artificial Intelligence Act. These risks particularly concern compliance with fundamental data protection principles, namely data minimisation, purpose limitation, data and system accuracy, and administrative challenges. These challenges arise due to legal, technical, and practical factors in developing algorithms for law enforcement. Addressing these risks and exploring practical mitigations, such as broadening the scope of data protection impact assessments, may enhance transparency and ensure that FRT is used for public security in a manner that serves the public interest.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
