Abstract
Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) over the supplementary motor area (SMA) may impact fine motor skills. This study evaluates different nTMS parameters in their capacity to affect fine motor performance on the way to develop an SMA mapping protocol. Twenty healthy volunteers performed a variety of fine motor tests during baseline and nTMS to the SMA using 5 Hz, 10 Hz, and theta-burst stimulation (TBS). Effects on performance were measured by test completion times (TCTs), standard deviation of inter-tap interval (SDIT), and visible coordination problems (VCPs). The predominant stimulation effect was slowing of TCTs, i.e. a slowdown of test performances during stimulation. Furthermore, participants exhibited VCPs like accidental use of contralateral limbs or inability to coordinate movements. More instances of significant differences between baseline and stimulation occurred during stimulation of the right hemisphere compared to left-hemispheric stimulation. In conclusion, nTMS to the SMA could enable new approaches in neuroscience and enable structured mapping approaches. Specifically, this study supports interhemispheric differences in motor control as right-hemispheric stimulation resulted in clearer impairments. The application of our nTMS-based setup to assess the function of the SMA should be applied in patients with changed anatomo-functional representations as the next step, e.g. among patients with eloquent brain tumors.
Highlights
Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation over the supplementary motor area (SMA) may impact fine motor skills
The present study aims for systematic testing of Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) effects on a variety of motor-related tasks by applying multiple stimulation protocols within healthy adults
This study was performed in twenty healthy volunteers (8 males and 12 females, median age: 22.5 years, age range: 19–30 years), who were right-handed according to the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory
Summary
Regression and visible coordination problems: For simulated page turning, the stimulation of the right hemisphere (independent of the executing hand) seemed to result in slightly shorter TCT of on average 0.1 s (95%-CI = [−0.2; −0.0], p = 0.0050) compared to stimulation of the left hemisphere in the model. Regression and visible coordination problems: The regression model revealed an independent effect for the hand and the stimulation protocols, with 0.7 s (95%-CI = [−0.8; −0.5], p < 0.0005) faster TCT for the right hand than for the left hand, and on average 0.4 to 0.5 s slower TCTs for the stimulation protocols compared to baseline (p < 0.0005 for all protocols; Table 2).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.