Abstract

We address the nature of the $X(2370)$ resonance observed in the $J/\psi$ radiative decays, $J/\psi\rightarrow\gamma K^{+} K^{-}\eta'$, $J/\psi\rightarrow\gamma K_S K_S\eta'$ and $J/\psi\rightarrow\gamma \pi^{+}\pi^{-}\eta'$. By studying the invariant mass spectra we confirm that decays of the $X(2370)$ into three pseudo-scalars are well described by an effective chiral Lagrangian. We extract the branching ratio of $J/\psi\to X(2370)\gamma$ and show that it is an order of magnitude larger compared to the glueball production rate predicted by lattice QCD. This indicates that $X(2370)$ is not likely to be a glueball candidate.

Highlights

  • INTRODUCTIONImportant discoveries have been made about strong interactions, especially in regards to the spectrum of hadrons

  • Over the past decade, important discoveries have been made about strong interactions, especially in regards to the spectrum of hadrons

  • Different phenomenological consequences, and here, we propose to compare the measured J=ψ radiative decay branching ratios to those predicted by Lattice QCD (LQCD) to investigate if the recently observed Xð2370Þ resonance is a good candidate for the pseudoscalar glueball

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Important discoveries have been made about strong interactions, especially in regards to the spectrum of hadrons. The recent observation of the odderon [16], in the high-energy pp and ppcollisions, may be related to existence of a C-odd glueball resonance in the direct channel. It is the gluon compound in J=ψ radiative. Different phenomenological consequences, and here, we propose to compare the measured J=ψ radiative decay branching ratios to those predicted by LQCD to investigate if the recently observed Xð2370Þ resonance is a good candidate for the pseudoscalar glueball. Following [26], we postulate the effective interactions between the Xð2370Þ and the light scalar and pseudoscalar meson resonances that appear to dominate its decay spectrum. By comparing our results with those of the QCD predictions [21] and the models [26,27], we can distinguish whether the Xð2370Þ is more likely to be a glueball or a qqresonance

FORMALISM
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Results from experiment or LQCD
SUMMARY
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.