Abstract

The geometric and electronic structures of the title compounds are investigated using relativistic, gradient-corrected density functional theory. The metal−ligand bond lengths in the transactinide compounds are found to be generally larger than for the 3d, 4d, and 5d systems, suggesting that the actinide contraction is not significantly bigger than the lanthanide analogue. Excellent agreement is obtained between computed and experimental valence ionization energies. The localization properties of the key 1e2 electrons are analyzed and suggest that the cycloheptatrienyl ring functions more as a −3 ligand than as a +1 ligand in these mixed ring complexes. Comparisons are made with previous photoelectron spectroscopic determinations of the character of the 1e2 electrons. The metal−cycloheptatrienyl bonding energies are calculated and are found to be weakest for the transactinide molecules.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.