Abstract

Besides viewing knowledge about the nature of science (NOS) as important for its own value with respect to scientific literacy, an adequate understanding of NOS is expected to improve science content learning by fostering the ability to interrelate scientific concepts and, thus, coherently acquire scientific content knowledge. However, there is a lack of systematic investigations, which clarify the relations between NOS and science content learning. In this paper, we present the results of a study, conducted to investigate how NOS understanding relates to students’ acquisition of a proper understanding of the concept of energy. A total of 82 sixth and seventh grade students received an instructional unit on energy, with 41 of them receiving generic NOS instruction beforehand. This NOS instruction, however, did not result in students having higher scores on the NOS instrument. Thus, correlational analyses were performed to investigate how students’ NOS understanding prior to the energy unit related to their learning about science content. Results show that a more adequate understanding of NOS might relate to students’ perspective on the concept of energy and might support them in understanding the nature of energy as a theoretical concept. Students with higher NOS understanding, for example, seemed to be more capable of learning how to relate the different energy forms to each other and to justify why they can be subsumed under the term of energy. Further, we found that NOS understanding may also be related to students’ approach toward energy degradation—a concept that can be difficult for students to master—while it does not seem to have a substantive impact on students’ learning gain regarding energy forms, transformation, or conservation.

Highlights

  • Nature of science (NOS) has long been promoted as an important content of science education (Lederman 2007; Lederman and Lederman 2014; Schulz 2014) and has been included in multiple standard documents worldwide (McComas and Olson 1998; e.g., NGSS Lead States 2013)

  • There appears to be a strong argument for an inclusion of NOS in science instruction with regard to epistemic aspects of scientific concepts, whereas at the same time, there is only little empirical evidence that NOS instruction supports the learning of science content—its epistemic and non-epistemic aspects

  • Groups were found to not differ significantly (p > .05) prior to the energy treatment. Note that this means that we did not find a significant difference between the two groups regarding NOS understanding—even though group A, but not group B, had received NOS instruction prior to the assessment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Nature of science (NOS) has long been promoted as an important content of science education (Lederman 2007; Lederman and Lederman 2014; Schulz 2014) and has been included in multiple standard documents worldwide (McComas and Olson 1998; e.g., NGSS Lead States 2013). Teixeira et al (2012) provide a synthesis of studies that focus at these goals, using aspects of history and philosophy of science to support science content instruction They conclude that such instruction has the potential to foster both NOS understanding as well as science content learning, the results of the studies that they analyzed were somewhat inconsistent and did not focus on the interplay of the two outcomes. There appears to be a strong argument for an inclusion of NOS in science instruction with regard to epistemic aspects of scientific concepts, whereas at the same time, there is only little empirical evidence that NOS instruction supports the learning of science content—its epistemic and non-epistemic (i.e., disciplinary) aspects

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call