Abstract

An industry is a natural monopoly if total costs of production are lower when a single firm produces the entire industry output than when any collection of two or more firms divide the total among themselves. An industry can be a natural monopoly if production by a single firm is the outcome of unrestricted competition, or a natural monopoly may exist if competitive forces lead to a different industry structure. Generally a natural monopoly is characterized by subadditivity of a representative firm’s cost function. A cost function c is subadditive at an output x if \( c(x)\le c\left({x}^1\right)+c\left({x}^2\right)+\cdots +c\left({x}^k\right) \) for all non-negative x 1,…, x k such that \( {\displaystyle {\sum}_{i=1}^k{x}^i=x} \). If all prospective firms in the industry have the same cost function, or if one firm has a uniformly better technology, then subadditivity implies that industry costs are minimized if only one firm is active in the market. While subadditivity is a purely technical condition, it is also possible for natural monopoly to arise from purely economic forces if the imperfectly competitive outcome is inefficient. However, competition in a market with a small number of firms is inherently the domain of game theory and a unique equilibrium outcome is rarely found. Therefore it is generally acceptable to adopt the technical criterion of subadditivity as the defining characteristic of natural monopoly.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.