Abstract

Psychiatric practice routinely uses semistructured and/or unstructured free text to record the behavior and mental state of patients. Many of these data are unstructured, lack standardization, and are difficult to use for analysis. Thus, it is difficult to quantitatively analyze a patient’s illness trajectory over time and his or her responsiveness to treatment, and it is also difficult to compare different patients quantitatively. In this article, experts in the field of psychiatry, along with machine learning models, have collaboratively transformed patient data available in status assessments generated by physicians into binary vector representations. Data from patients with mental health disorders collected within a real-world clinical setting from one of the largest behavioral electronic health record (EHR) systems in the United States have been used for generating these representations. The binary vector representation of these health records is shown to be useful in various clinical tasks, such as disease phenotyping, characterizing the suicidality of patients, and inferring diagnoses. To summarize, this approach can transform semistructured free-text summaries of patients’ status assessments into a structured, quantifiable format, which enriches the data that reside within EHR systems. This allows for effective intra- and interpatient quantifications and comparisons, which are much needed in the field of mental health. With the aid of these binary representations, patients’ mental states can be systematically tracked over time, as can their responses to medications at the individual and population levels.

Highlights

  • Mental disorders are among the most challenging illnesses to treat due to the paucity of biomarkers that identify and quantify the severity of disease, as is standard in other therapeutic areas

  • Computational Psychiatry of health care, external experiences and social constructs typically have a significant influence on the prognosis and efficacy of the treatment of mental health disorders

  • This has led to a call for a more rigorous, evidence-based system, called the Research Domain Criterion (RDoC; Cuthbert, 2014; Cuthbert & Insel, 2013; Cuthbert & Kozak, 2013), that will attempt to classify disorders based upon a combination of domains/constructs of behavior and mental capacity and units of analysis such as genes, molecules, cells, brain circuits, physiology, behavior, self-reports, and other paradigms

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mental disorders are among the most challenging illnesses to treat due to the paucity of biomarkers that identify and quantify the severity of disease, as is standard in other therapeutic areas. Diagnosis in mental health is based upon observations as specified by systems such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association, 2013) and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD; World Health Organization, 1993). There exists a significant gap between advances in neuroscience and their ultimate translation into treatment decisions This has led to a call for a more rigorous, evidence-based system, called the Research Domain Criterion (RDoC; Cuthbert, 2014; Cuthbert & Insel, 2013; Cuthbert & Kozak, 2013), that will attempt to classify disorders based upon a combination of domains/constructs of behavior and mental capacity and units of analysis such as genes, molecules, cells, brain circuits, physiology, behavior, self-reports, and other paradigms. Greater adoption of RDoC and similar systems will enable large, multiscale models to be used in conjunction with traditional therapeutics to improve the treatment of mental health disorders

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call