Abstract

The cognitive approach to psychotherapy aims to change patients' maladaptive schemas, that is, overly negative views on themselves, the world, or the future. To obtain awareness of these views, they record their thought processes in situations that caused pathogenic emotional responses. The schemas underlying such thought records have, thus far, been largely manually identified. Using recent advances in natural language processing, we take this one step further by automatically extracting schemas from thought records. To this end, we asked 320 healthy participants on Amazon Mechanical Turk to each complete five thought records consisting of several utterances reflecting cognitive processes. Agreement between two raters on manually scoring the utterances with respect to how much they reflect each schema was substantial (Cohen's κ = 0.79). Natural language processing software pretrained on all English Wikipedia articles from 2014 (GLoVE embeddings) was used to represent words and utterances, which were then mapped to schemas using k-nearest neighbors algorithms, support vector machines, and recurrent neural networks. For the more frequently occurring schemas, all algorithms were able to leverage linguistic patterns. For example, the scores assigned to the Competence schema by the algorithms correlated with the manually assigned scores with Spearman correlations ranging between 0.64 and 0.76. For six of the nine schemas, a set of recurrent neural networks trained separately for each of the schemas outperformed the other algorithms. We present our results here as a benchmark solution, since we conducted this research to explore the possibility of automatically processing qualitative mental health data and did not aim to achieve optimal performance with any of the explored models. The dataset of 1600 thought records comprising 5747 utterances is published together with this article for researchers and machine learning enthusiasts to improve upon our outcomes. Based on our promising results, we see further opportunities for using free-text input and subsequent natural language processing in other common therapeutic tools, such as ecological momentary assessments, automated case conceptualizations, and, more generally, as an alternative to mental health scales.

Highlights

  • E-mental health—delivering therapeutic interventions via information and communication technology—is regarded as a promising means of overcoming many barriers to traditional psychotherapeutic care

  • As the first and core hypothesis, we posited that utterances of thought records could be automatically scored with respect to their underlying schemas

  • With all three machine learning algorithm types that were tried, we found affirmative evidence for this

Read more

Summary

Introduction

E-mental health—delivering therapeutic interventions via information and communication technology—is regarded as a promising means of overcoming many barriers to traditional psychotherapeutic care. When the patient is asked to provide open, unconstrained textual information to the system, this information is typically either processed by a human in the case of guided systems or not processed at all in the case of autonomous systems [1] Both methods are arguably very robust to misunderstanding, human processing is costly while no processing offers no advantage over traditional paper-based workbooks. Developments in data-driven natural language understanding are increasingly able to reliably interpret unconstrained qualitative user input. We explore this opportunity for a specific therapeutic task in cognitive therapy: determining underlying maladaptive schemas from the information contained in thought record forms

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.