Natural Killer Cells Are Active Against Myeloma, Leukemia or Lymphoma Cells with Loss of Tumor Suppressor Genes

Abstract

The therapeutic targeting of tumor cells with loss of function (LOF) for tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) is challenging across cancers, including hematologic neoplasias, because pharmacological mechanisms to restore the function(s) of such genes are not readily feasible, in contrast to e.g., inhibition of oncogenic drivers. We reasoned, however, that, although LOF for TSGs leads to de-repressed growth of neoplastic hematopoietic cells, it may not necessarily protect them from immune attack. We thus explored the hypothesis that CRISPR-based loss of function of TSGs in cells from multiple myeloma (MM), leukemias or lymphoma may still be associated with substantial response to immune effector cells such as NK cells, which have the advantage to kill tumor cells across HLA barriers. We have conducted CRISPR-based studies in 7 cell lines that represent different hematologic malignancies and different levels of sensitivity to natural killer (NK) cells, namely the B-cell lymphoma (SUDHL4), precursor B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (NALM6), multiple myeloma (MM1.S, LP1, KMS11), chronic myeloid leukemia (K562), and acute myeloid leukemia (MOLM14). In these genome-scale or focused CRISPR screens for LOF (CRISPR-based gene editing) or gain of function (GOF, CRISPR activation), the blood cancer lines were exposed to allogeneic donor-derived NK cells (vs. control cultures without NK cells). We evaluated the performance of genes known to represent recurrent TSGs based on genomic data of patient samples or cell lines; as well as candidate TSGs, based on results from genome-scale CRISPR gene editing screens (e.g., CERES or CHRONOS scores >0.4 in multiple DepMap releases and TPM>1 [RNA-seq]) in the same cell lines as the NK cell resistance screens. These analyses sought to identify any TSGs whose LOF may potentially alter the response of blood cancer cells to NK cells. We also evaluated genes identified as top recurrent TSGs in patient samples from MM and other hematologic neoplasias (e.g., based on prior genomic studies). On aggregate, we evaluated a collection of known and recurrent TSGs (e.g., PTEN, TP53, RB1, CDKN2C, CDKN1B, TENT5C/FAM46C) as well as other, previously underappreciated candidate genes with TSG properties in hematologic neoplasias (e.g., HIF1A, DEPDC5). Perturbation of none of these genes was identified to meet criteria for association with significant resistance to allogeneic donor-derived NK cells (e.g., log2FC>1.0, at least 3-4 sgRNAs with enrichment upon CRISPR KO or depletion with CRISPR activation, p-value <0.05, enrichment rank <100, based on rank aggregation algorithm) in any of the MM, leukemia or lymphoma cell lines examined in LOF or GOF CRISPR screens for NK cell resistance. In fact, for a limited set of cases (e.g., PTEN in KMS11 cells), KO of a TSG was associated with sensitization to NK cell treatment. To probe the mechanistic basis for this lack of effect of TSG loss, we examined the molecular sequelae of CRISPR-based KO for one of these recurrent TSGs, PTEN, by performing scRNAseq using the CROP-seq platform. Pools of MM1.S and LP1 cells expressing sgRNAs targeting select hits from our CRISPR screens and also PTEN were co-cultured with NK cells for 24 h or left untreated, followed by scRNA-seq and sgRNA detection, differential gene-expression analysis. We observed in these studies that the transcriptional changes induced in MM cells by KO of PTEN included limited, if any, changes in the expression of key genes involved in regulation of NK cell responses of tumor cells, e.g., ligands for activating or inhibitor receptors in NK cells, death receptors (e.g., TRAIL, Fas) or their downstream effectors/regulators or other molecules identified from our aforementioned genome-scale and focused CRISPR LOF and GOF studies. Notably, our in-house results from studies of NK exposure of cell lines from hematologic neoplasias are concordant with results for these TSGs in CRISPR screens of non-hematological cancer cells treated with cytotoxic T-cells (e.g., 4T1 or RENCA cells; GSE149933). Overall, our observations indicate that MM, leukemia or lymphoma cells that become deficient for diverse TSGs based on CRISPR-based gene editing are equally responsive to NK cells as their TSG-proficient counterparts. NK cell-based therapies may thus be a promising approach to target TSG-deficient hematologic malignancies for which specific pharmacological therapies are not currently available.