Natural history of coronary stents: 14 year follow-up of drug eluting stents versus bare metal stents

Abstract

BackgroundSeveral randomized trials have shown the effectiveness of drug-eluting stents (DES) over bare metal stents (BMS) in terms of repeat revascularization at 1 year; however long term data in this context is conflicting. AimTo assess the long term clinical outcomes after coronary artery stenting with drug-eluting stents and bare metal stents. MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study, including 100 consecutive patients with Coronary Artery Disease who underwent successful percutaneous intervention (PCI) with implantation of DES and contemporary 100 patients who underwent PCI with implantation of BMS in the years 2005 and 2006 at our center. ResultsOver a median follow-up of 14 years, the primary composite outcome of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) was found to be similar in both the groups [DES-37; BMS-36 (p value = 0.88)]. At 1 year of follow-up, the incidence of MACCE was significantly lower with DES group than BMS group [DES-3; BMS-10, P value = 0.04]; but the benefit was not seen at 5 years, 10 years and 14 years follow-up. The incidence of very late stent thrombosis in our study population was similar in either of the groups (p value = 0.13). Obesity and creatinine of >1.4 mg/dl were found to be the predictors of all-cause death. ConclusionIn patients with coronary artery disease, the composite endpoint of MACCE for the first year after stenting was significantly lower in patients receiving DES than those receiving BMS; however, at very long term follow-up, the event rates were similar.