Abstract

Simple SummaryStudies investigating whether a captive environment is meeting the needs of the species housed are relatively common among captive mammals. However, studies exploring fish behaviour in captive display enclosures are far less common in the scientific literature. Focusing on a small group of sharks, rays and smaller fish within a single display, our objectives were to; assess whether the behaviours of a select number of individual fishes within a single display are altered after the environment is enriched to enhance environmental complexity and visitor exposure is reduced, and also to increase our understanding of captive fish behaviour to improve capacity for evidence-based management decisions. In summary, increased environmental complexity and reduced visitor interaction showed correlations with increased expression of natural behaviours in all fish studied, including increased space use and decreased abnormal repetitive behaviours in some species. These results reflect a change toward more natural wild behavioural time budgets. Studying behaviour change in fish in different environmental conditions provides a good basis for evidence-based decision making.This study investigated the behaviour of two Elasmobranch species; Southern fiddler ray (Trygonorrhina dumerilii, n = 1) and Port Jackson shark (Heterodontus portusjacksoni, n = 4) and two teleost species; moonlighter (Tilodon sexfasciatus, n = 1) and banded morwong (Cheilodactylus spectabilis, n = 1) living within a single enclosure. For this study, two treatments were compared, the original enclosure design, and then after the enclosure had been renovated to more closely represent the species natural habitats, with a raised front viewing glass to prevent visitor interaction. Behaviours such as resting, swimming and abnormal behaviours such as surface and perimeter swimming (elasmobranchs only) were recorded as well as location within the enclosure, for 10 days pre and 10 days post renovation. The Port Jackson sharks significantly reduced the performance of abnormal behaviours after renovation, and significantly increased the time spent near the exhibit front. The Southern fiddler ray increased resting post renovation, while the teleost species also spent more time near the exhibit front. Although a small sample size was used, the results suggest that a more naturalistic environment with multiple micro-habitats and effective visitor barriers allows for a greater proportion of the day spent exhibiting natural behaviours, greater space use and reduced stereotypes.

Highlights

  • Captive institutions such as zoos and aquariums were guided by a minimum standard when designing animal enclosures, providing perceived adequate environmental conditions for the basic needs for the animal’s survival and physiological health [1,2,3]

  • There is a great deal of targeted research focusing on the relationship between behavioural ecology, environmental complexity and the overall welfare states of captive animals. [1,6,7,8,9]

  • Using various indicators, including behaviour, numerous studies have emphasised the complexity of an enclosure and the environmental enrichment provided can be critical in facilitating positive welfare outcomes, as well as allowing individuals to express agency through choice and control when confronted with stressors associated with captivity [10,11,12,13,14,15,16]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Captive institutions such as zoos and aquariums were guided by a minimum standard when designing animal enclosures, providing perceived adequate environmental conditions for the basic needs for the animal’s survival and physiological health [1,2,3]. These standards were largely based on a limited understanding of the specific and varied behavioural ecologies of the species under care, and perhaps reflecting the current attitudes towards animal welfare importance of the era [4]. Enclosures that reflect more naturalistic living conditions have been found to accommodate greater species-specific natural behaviours, likely reflecting more positive experiences in animals [1,10,17,18,19]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call