Abstract
The need for a sound methodology to establish a formal value separating natural geochemical background levels in groundwaters from the anthropogenic impact, is perceived especially from a legal point of view. In this research we compare the natural background levels derived for As, F, Mn and Fe in a volcanic-sedimentary aquifer in Central Italy, using probability plots and pre-selection methods. The derived values may differ by even two orders of magnitude for strongly skewed distributions. Results show that both methods have a degree of subjectivity, however the integration of the two methods reinforces the validity of the assessment. Critical issues include statistical data distribution choice, minimum population size, distance of the sampling sites from anthropized areas. Pre-selection methods appear more robust than probability plots when the hydrogeological asset is duly considered. The greater importance of the aquifer conceptual model of the system, than the choice of a statistical method, is pointed out.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
