Abstract
Drawing on fieldwork conducted in Cambodia and its diaspora since 2004, this article explores tensions that arise when individuals and institutions impose nation-state ideologies on music and ritual that predate the nation-state concept and transcend official state boundaries. In numerous contexts, musicians and dancers in Cambodia and Thailand perform offerings and blessings that honor their teachers and initiate artistic lineages. Due to broad influence from India and centuries of conflict and borrowing, these rituals—though not necessarily their musical content—have proliferated in these two countries. I describe these nearly identical rituals—called thvāy grū in Khmer and wai khruu in Thai—and their contexts before outlining the historical narratives that have led to their attainment of political and nationalist significance. Today, individuals and institutions in both nations claim that these rituals effect a continuity that reflects each country’s unique national identity. Using Paul Ricoeur’s essay on “Memory and Forgetting,” I argue that these rituals fulfill a “duty to remember” that, in Cambodia’s case, counteracts a colonial narrative of decline. However, this remembering works against an equally essential task, what Ricoeur calls “the duty to forget.” I argue that the prioritizing of memory over forgetting, enacted by the thvāy grū and wai khruu, contributes to the continuing animosity and violence between Cambodia and Thailand. In making this argument, I attempt to show how ethnomusicology can move beyond consideration of how ritual reflects social structures to explore music and ritual’s role in inculcating political thought.
Highlights
Follow this and additional works at: http://elischolar.library.yale.edu/yjmr Part of the Asian History Commons, Ethnomusicology Commons, and the History of Religions of Eastern Origins Commons
In mid-January 2003, the Khmer newspaper Rasmei Angkor alleged that the famous Thai actress Suvanan Kongying—known as Morning Star—said that she would not perform in Cambodia again until the temple Angkor Wat was returned to Thailand and that she would rather be reincarnated as a dog than as a Khmer
UNESCO’s designation reignited a longstanding border dispute regarding the land surrounding the temple, a late ninth-century complex built by the Khmer king Yasovarman
Summary
Jeffrey M. (2017) "Nationalist Transformations: Music, Ritual, and the Work of Memory in Cambodia and Thailand," Yale Journal of Music & Religion: Vol 3: No 2, Article 2. (2017) "Nationalist Transformations: Music, Ritual, and the Work of Memory in Cambodia and Thailand," Yale Journal of Music & Religion: Vol 3: No 2, Article 2. Cover Page Footnote I am deeply grateful to Boston University professors Marié Abe, Michael Birenbaum Quintero, Brita Heimarck, and Miki Kaneda for their support and insightful suggestions. Thanks to Benjamin Tausig and Jeffers Engelhardt for their helpful comments on an earlier version and to Margaret Rowley, Brian Barone, and Rachel Kurihara for being extra pairs of eyes and ears. My thanks to Song Seng for his assistance with the “Hom Rong” song translation. Thanks to Bou Lim, who first taught me Khmer poetry, and Frank Smith, who taught me additional forms. Thanks to Robert Bickner for suggesting the works of William Gedney and Nidhi Eoseewong. This article is available in Yale Journal of Music & Religion: http://elischolar.library.yale.edu/yjmr/vol3/iss2/2
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.