Abstract

AbstractDoes religion motivate and intensify nationalism, or does religion moderate and even suppress nationalism? Six kinds of relationships between nationalism and religion are critically reviewed: nationalism as a modern religion in competition with traditional religions; religious origins of the “Chosen People” as the mythomoteur of nationalism; religious exclusion as nation-building; religious influences on national policies; influence of religious observance on national identification; and religiously based “civilizations” transcending nationalisms. Western Christian experience with nationalism is not generalizable due to the institutional autonomy and supranational organization of the Catholic Church. Western European nationalisms were premised on religious sectarian homogeneity, and the homogenous “confessional state” served as the template of European nation-states. Furthermore, I argue that the late medieval eradication of Muslims and Jews across Western Europe prefigured sectarian and ethnonational purges of the following centuries. Finally, I argue that different configurations of religion and nationalism depend on two critical conditions: the degree to which the dominant religious tradition is doctrinally supraethnic and institutionally transnational, and the religious identity of the main adversary in the constitutive conflict that culminated in national statehood. The crises of Marxism and liberalism provide the context for the resurgence of religion and nationalism at present.

Highlights

  • What is the relationship between nationalism and religion? Is nationalism a “replacement” or “substitute” for religion in modern times? Does religion motivate and intensify nationalism, or on the contrary, does religion moderate and weaken nationalism? Does modern nationalism have a symbiotic or parasitic relationship with religiosity? How can one characterize the overall relationship between nationalism and religion: a zero-sum game or a win-win game? There have been surprisingly few systematic attempts to answer these critical questions of modern identity politics

  • This state of the field article will provide a few preliminary answers based on the extant scholarship, and offer a novel typology that explains nationalist-religious configurations in comparative perspective

  • The scholarship of earlier generations that focused on the relationship of nationalism and religion, such as the works of Carlton Hayes (1926, 1960), are mostly neglected, making knowledge accumulation more difficult

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There have been surprisingly few systematic attempts to answer these critical questions of modern identity politics. What is the relationship between nationalism and religion? Does modern nationalism have a symbiotic or parasitic relationship with religiosity? How can one characterize the overall relationship between nationalism and religion: a zero-sum game or a win-win game? This state of the field article will provide a few preliminary answers based on the extant scholarship, and offer a novel typology that explains nationalist-religious configurations in comparative perspective.

Şener Aktürk
A New Typology of National-Religious Configurations

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.