Abstract
The objectives of this study were to describe head computed tomography (CT) technical factors used in the United States; assess guideline compliance and variability by sex, geographic region, institution, and manufacturer; and compare with NEXT (Nationwide Evaluation of X-ray Trends) survey. Two thousand thirty-five head CT studies from 895 sites were analyzed. Peak kilovoltage, exposure, slice and image number, slice thickness, field of view, interslice gap, reformations, examination inclusiveness, use of contrast, and reconstruction filter were compared by sex, geographic region, institution type, and manufacturer. One hundred twenty to 140 kVp (peak kilovoltage) was used by 99.8% of the sites. There was no correlation between mAs and kVp. There was a 30-fold increase in number of images and nearly 9-fold increase in number of slices from least to most. Nearly 4% use slice thickness and interslice gap greater than guidelines. There were significant regional differences in field of view, image number, and slice thickness. Some variation related to manufacturers was found. Minor difference was also found between academic and nonacademic institutions. There were significant differences in kVp and mAs compared with NEXT. Significant variations in head CT technique exist in the United States.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
