Abstract

9 Background: Our objective was to assess treatment patterns, outcomes, and costs for women with low- (LIR) and high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer (HIR) who are treated with and without adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). Methods: All pts with endometrioid endometrial cancer who underwent surgery from 2000 – 2011 were identified from the SEER – Medicare database. LIR was defined as G1-2 tumors with <50% myometrial invasion or G3 with no invasion. HIR was defined as G1-2 tumors with ≥50% or G3 with <50% invasion. Pts were categorized according to whether they received adjuvant RT (vaginal brachytherapy [VBT], external beam radiotherapy [EBRT], or both) or no RT. All costs incurred up to 6 months postoperatively were analyzed. Outcomes were compared using the χ2test and a Cox PH regression model. Multivariate analyses were performed on both survival and costs. Results: 10,842 pts were included, of which 70% were LIR and 30% were HIR. 9% of pts with LIR had RT, compared to 46% of those with HIR. Among all pts who underwent RT, the use of VBT increased from 25% in 2000 to 71% in 2011, while EBRT use declined from 41% to 18%, and concurrent VBT/EBRT declined from 34% to 11% (p<0.001). In the LIR group, there was no difference in 10-year overall survival (OS) between pts who had RT and those who did not (67% vs. 65%, multivariate HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.81 – 1.11). In the HIR group, pts who underwent RT had a significant increase in 10-year OS (60% vs. 47%, multivariate HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67 – 0.85). Similar outcomes were noted on subgroup analysis stratifying by RT modality. RT was associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal (7% vs. 4%, p<0.001), genitourinary (2% vs. 1%, p<0.001), and hematologic (16% vs. 12%, p<0.001) 2-year complications. Compared to pts who only had surgery, RT was associated with increased mean adjusted costs ($22.5k vs. $14.4k, p<0.001). Costs for pts receiving VBT, EBRT, and concurrent VBT/EBRT were $20.6k, $23.3k, and $26.5, respectively (p<0.001). Conclusions: RT was associated with improved OS in women with HIR, but not in the LIR cohort. RT also had significantly increased costs and a higher morbidity risk. In the absence of other risk factors, consideration of observation without RT in LIR may be reasonable.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.