Abstract

To measure the nasalance scores of Brazilian Portuguese-speaking young adults from the states of Sao Paulo and Minas Gerais in order to investigate whether dialect variations and gender affect these scores. Nasalance was assessed in 36 individuals: 20 native residents of Sao Paulo state (mean age=23 y.o.) and 16 native residents of Minas Gerais state (mean age=24 y.o.), following the same criteria. Nasalance measures were taken using the Nasometer II 6400 (KayPentax) device based on the reading of three texts (nasal-1, nasal-2, and oral). Intergroup nasalance scores were compared using the unpaired Student's t test considering two experimental groups. The nasalance scores in individuals from the states of Sao Paulo and Minas Gerais were 52.7% and 48.8% for the nasal-1 text, 49.6% and 49.9% for the nasal-2 text, and 14.3% and 9.8% for the oral text, respectively. Statistical analysis comparing the mean nasalance scores in both groups showed significant difference (p=0.03) only for the oral text, in which individuals from Sao Paulo state presented higher scores. Although nasalance scores were lower in individuals from Minas Gerais state compared with those of individuals from Sao Paulo state, both groups presented values within the normal range. The variable gender was not relevant in the nasalance assessment; however, a tendency for higher scores was observed in women compared with men from Minas Gerais state in the same group in the reading of the nasal-2 text. This study contributes to the knowledge of nasalance reference scores for two different populations of Brazilian Portuguese speakers; however, the results herein reported should be interpreted with caution due to the small study sample size.

Highlights

  • Speech, the main form of human communication, results from the effective coordination between various physical subsystems, including respiration, phonation, resonance, and articulation[1]

  • No statistically significant difference was observed in nasalance scores between men and women both for the Sao Paulo state group and the Minas Gerais state group in the different texts presented (Table 1)

  • This study revealed higher nasalance scores for residents of Sao Paulo state compared with those of individuals from Minas Gerais state regarding the oral text

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The main form of human communication, results from the effective coordination between various physical subsystems, including respiration, phonation, resonance, and articulation[1]. Speech resonance is influenced by factors such as the impedance provided by the oral cavity, the lips, and nasal permeability. The combination of these elements can produce balanced, hypernasal, or hyponasal speech resonance[2]. Perceptual assessment is the main method used by speech‐language pathologists to evaluate speech nasality[2,3]. It is a subjective method which depends on the experience of the examiners, with risk of intra- and/or inter-rater discordance[4,5,6]. The use of instrumental methods is important to complement this clinical evaluation, as well as to allow better planning and monitoring of the results of therapeutic procedures[4,7,8]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call