Abstract

In Ulumul Qur’an, the existence of discourse about abrogating (Nasakh) is the real proof that there is a dialectic relationship between revelation andreality. Nasakh is the cancellation of the law. It could be eliminating and releasing the text of the law referring to reading. It also could be defending the text to show the instruction of abrogated law. The research is based on qualitative descriptive study that limits the study on the Mawaris and Wasiyat verses. The paper is expected to provide scientific contributions in the formof conceptualization of Ulumul Qur’an oriented to legal legislation and to provide intellectual contributions that combine theory of Nasakh in Ulumul Qur’an through a legal context of usul fiqh. Therefore, it is also possible tobe an alternative development of Philosophy of Islamic Law.Keywords: Nasakh, Legal Legislation, Wasiat, Mawaris.

Highlights

  • Abstrak Dalam ulumul Qur’an, adanya diskursus mengenai Nasakh merupakan bukti terbesar bahwa terdapat dialektika hubungan antara wahyu dan realitas

  • In Ulumul Qur’an, the existence of discourse about abrogating (Nasakh) is the real proof that there is a dialectic relationship between revelation and reality

  • Nasakh is the cancellation of the law

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Abstrak Dalam ulumul Qur’an, adanya diskursus mengenai Nasakh merupakan bukti terbesar bahwa terdapat dialektika hubungan antara wahyu dan realitas. Baik dengan menghapuskan dan melepaskan teks yang menunjuk hukum dari bacaan atau membiarkan teks tersebut tetap ada sebagai petunjuk adanya hukum yang dimansukh. Dalam teks atau naskah sehingga terangkum lebih padat isinya, dengan tanpa mengesampingkan ranah kajian ulumul Qur’an dan ushul fiqh/ Filsafat Hukum Islam.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call