Abstract
Fans’ analysis of their creative practices and of writing generally, academics’ capture of this narrative and discursive material represent a heterogeneous collection of meta-discourses. How is this circulation of « meta » narratives and discourses expressing a reflexive thinking about writing? We focus on a discursive spread as a fragmentation-organization process, which does not bring into conflict fans and academics’ metanarratives and metadiscourses, but apprehends a binding dichotomy or a co-extensive principle (Masoni Lacroix & Cailler, 2016), which expose this multiplicity. We stress on an emancipating-(re)normalizing movement of writing, named met@ttachment, as a constitutive principle of fannish narrativities, having an effect on scientific writing.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
