Abstract
This essay explores women’s participation in revolutionary practice, as mapped out in Mahasweta Devi’s short story “Draupadi”. Does Devi romanticise the female revolutionary or centralise the limitations of counter-state activity? This question leads to the way that nationalism, as embodied by the state (through the character of Senanayak), is foregrounded in the text. The restrictions placed upon women by the nation-state are juxtaposed against the issue of female subjectivity, and dominant myths of femininity become a vehicle for mediating notions of female behaviour. I will argue that during nationalist crises, in particular, when the nation is most vulnerable, nationalist signifiers are rigorously applied. Nationalist crises empower Devi’s protagonist, whose suffering enables her to go beyond the boundaries of myth, so that in the short story “Draupadi” the mythical figure is reconstructed (as Dopdi) to produce a counter-narrative by deploying the female body and sexuality as the locus of resistance. In selecting the Draupadi myth as a model for the subaltern woman, Devi calls attention to the politics of myth, of how some myths are privileged (like the Sita myth) while the ambiguities within others (like the Draupadi myth) marginalise women. Devi’s protagonist is situated at the point of breakdown between myth and its “real-life” context and finds that it is through extreme, “terrifying” measures that one can secure agency, even if it is only in fictional narratives.
Highlights
This essay explores women’s participation in revolutionary practice, as mapped out in Mahasweta Devi’s short story “Draupadi”
54 |Silva people – handling rifles and challenging their oppressors – “might seem insignificant to the urban middle class, [but it] was immensely significant to the rural poor”; giving rise to the simplistic view that the Naxalite movement was the happy marriage between the peasant/subaltern and the middle-class intellectuals (Banerjee v)
This historic moment is generally appropriated as a middle-class rather than a peasant tragedy and retrospective analyses of the Naxalite movement accentuate the involvement of the intellectuals, tending to overlook the input of the peasantry
Summary
This essay explores women’s participation in revolutionary practice, as mapped out in Mahasweta Devi’s short story “Draupadi”. Nationalist crises empower Devi’s protagonist, and her suffering enables her to go beyond the boundaries of myth, so that in the short story the mythical figure is reconstructed to produce a counter-narrative by deploying the female body and sexuality as the locus of resistance.4 Bloom points out that “many people have assumed that women could not consciously choose to participate in terrorism of their own volition.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.