Abstract
Recent critics provide compelling accounts of Olive Chancellor’s unprecedented queerness in The Bostonians. Where these accounts tend to focus on how James approaches Olive as a type, they often leave unexplored the full force of both Basil and the narrator’s prejudice in shaping Olive’s representation. This essay re-orients the discussion to the novel’s narratological structure and examines how James frames the politics of her sexual difference through a prejudicial narrator who erases sympathetic portrayals of Olive’s difference. James responds to dangers that queers faced in participating in public social life and offers narrative strategies by which to read Olive sympathetically. The essay offers a reconsideration of formal practices in narratology and queer theory and suggests that The Bostonians provides important context for reading queer narrative style at the end of the nineteenth and beginning of the twentieth century.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.