Narrative medicine: A useful approach for difficult conversations.

Abstract

6 Background: Narrative medicine (NM) is acknowledged as an effective approach for valuing patient and provider experiences. The NM approach requires developing narrative competence to “recognize, absorb, interpret, and honor” the stories of self and other (Charon, 2010). Given the difficulties providers face engaging in end-of-life (EOL) and advance care planning (ACP) conversations, this study reports the results of a NM workshop to 1) develop skills in attending and responding to the stories of others as part of ACP conversations and 2) reflect on their own stories of loss in relation to their professional practice. Methods: 80 health care professionals participated in a workshop on NM principles for end-of-life care and completed both pre- and post-workshop surveys. Workshop activities included a close reading on a professional’s story of personal loss and a reflective writing exercise sharing one’s own personal story of loss. Small groups debriefed after each exercise. 2 participants were current students and were dropped from analysis, for a final analytic sample of 78. Participants completed surveys at baseline and at the conclusion of the workshop. Surveys included questions on participant demographics, confidence for EOL conversations, and the ACP Self Efficacy scale. Descriptive statistics were calculated for sample demographics and post-workshop evaluation questions. A paired sample t-test was used to compare ACP Self Efficacy scores pre- and post-workshop. Confidence for EOL conversations was compared pre- and post-workshop using Kendall’s tau-b. Results: The mean age of the sample was 46.6 years (SD 13.1), 94% were female, and 82% were White. Social workers represented 84.6% of the sample. 53% of the sample reported having some type of advance care directive for themselves. Self-efficacy for engaging in ACP conversations increased from pre- to post-workshop (p < 0.0001) and there was a statistically significant improvement in confidence discussing death and dying from pre- to post-workshop (p = 0.004). Conclusions: NM competencies improve self-efficacy and confidence for engaging in ACP and EOL conversations. Providers find the NM approach to be a useful framework for engaging in difficult conversations about end-of-life.