Abstract
The life story, or narrative identity, is a psychosocial construction that brings together and integrates the self and experience within a broad story-based framework. Personality psychologists typically capture aspects of this inner story by prompting participants for descriptions of life chapters and/or specific and self-definitional autobiographical key scenes (e.g., high points, low points, turning points). Features of participants’ responses are then quantified for their thematic and/or structural content. There exists a number of additional and complementary assessment techniques that could buttress study of, and theory pertaining to, narrative identity. Here, I work to identify these assessments, which include self-reports, informant reports, and behavioral observations, and organize them within narrative identity’s nomological network. This work concludes with a number of suggestions for the ways in which traditional assessments may be better attuned to capture narrative identity’s integrative nature.
Highlights
Relevance StatementThe field of narrative identity is at a unique an enviable crossroads
We have amassed a sizable literature demonstrating that our typical approach for assessing features of participants’ storied identities is valid
In the Awareness of Narrative Identity Questionnaire (ANIQ; Hallford & Mellor, 2017), participants are prompted to rate a number of items tapping their beliefs regarding the ‘awareness’ of narrative (e.g., “My memories are like stories that help me understand my identity”) whereas the Love and Story and Storytelling questionnaire (LASS; Dunlop, 2019) contains a scale that may be used to assess perceptions regarding the degree to which respondents view their romantic relationships as if they were stories (e.g., “I often think about my romantic relationship as if it were a story, complete with characters and a plot”)
Summary
The field of narrative identity is at a unique an enviable crossroads. We have amassed a sizable literature demonstrating that our typical approach for assessing features of participants’ storied identities (in which we prompt for oral or written descriptions of key scenes and quantify the resulting text for certain thematic and structural features) is valid. One path forward consists of continuing with this more-or-less standard assessment paradigm. A second path consists of expanding our assessments, beyond the analysis of text, to capture narrative identity’s broader nomological network. This theoretical review explores the second of these paths. It holds relevance to narrative identity researchers, those who wish to better incorporate the study of narrative identity in their work, and personality psychologists interested in measurement and assessment
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.