Abstract

25 participants with DLB and 12 participants with AD underwent a ND test based on an illustrated story. The test was selected from the French language assessment corpus GREMOTS. The grading of the ND was done according to the following six parameters: lexicon, syntax, pragmatics, presence of the main actions, quality of discourse and informativeness. In the early stage, a quarter of the participants with DLB are under cut-off score for ND, and this proportion strongly increases in the advanced stage. In contrast, all the participants with AD show a pathological ND in both stages. In the early stage, the ND abilities appear significantly better preserved in participants with DLB than in participants with AD. No difference is found in the advanced stage. This result highlights two distinct language profiles, with the participants with AD being significantly less informative than the participants with DLB in the early stage. Furthermore, the participants with DLB show pathological scores spreading over the six parameters, whereas the participants with AD have more selective impairments. Indeed, the informativeness of participants with AD is 100% pathological while their syntax is 100% preserved. These results are encouraging as they could enable speech therapists to better adjust their follow-up according to the linguistic profile of the patients and to educate caregivers more appropriately. Further research on language issues in DLB and AD is essential.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call