Abstract

The present investigation tested an assumption of the Continuum Hypothesis that representations of the self are coordinated with representations of others, or “objects.” A sample of 373 university students responded to measures of Self-Esteem, Adaptive Narcissism, Maladaptive Narcissism, Positive Affect, and Negative Affect under normal instructions and then again under procedures in which they imagined themselves in the presence of a Supportive Object that promoted the experience of a “good and happy self” or a Destructive Object associated with a “bad and unhappy self.” Supportive Objects produced decreases in Negative Affect and increases in all other measures, whereas Destructive Objects caused a generally opposite pattern of changes. Data for Maladaptive Narcissism suggested that each type of object was associated with maturational challenges. For both groups, Self-Esteem instability predicted greater overall self-representation instability, but evidence of instability was more obvious in the Destructive than in the Supportive Object condition. These results confirmed, but also revealed a need for refining, the Continuum Hypothesis.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call