Abstract

Angular scatterometry is a fast, in-line, noncontact, and nondestructive nanoscale metrology tool that is widely used in manufacturing processes. As scatterometry is a potential metrology technique for next generation semiconductor manufacturing and for other emerging large-area (roll-to-roll) nanotechnology products such as wire grid polarizers (WGPs) and nanostructured metamaterials, it is necessary to study its fundamental sensitivity and accuracy limitations. Two different samples are simulated using rigorous coupled-wave analysis. One is a high index contrast aluminum WGP structure, and the other is a low-index contrast resist grating on a polycarbonate substrate. During modeling, the sample structure is scaled by simultaneously scaling both the line width and the height of the grating with a fixed pitch and all linear dimensions, including pitch, line width, and grating height, of the structure. Two metrics are chosen to define the limits: the first is the comparison with experimental limits, that is, if the reflection difference for a 5% scaling variation is larger than the experimental noise floor, scatterometry has sufficient resolution to recover the metrology information; the second is the comparison with effective medium models, that is, if the simulated angular scatterometry signature differs from an effective medium model signature, again within experimental noise limits, scatterometry is judged to have sufficient resolution to determine the feature parameters. Using a 405 nm source, scatterometry provides sufficient information to analyze a 20 nm pitch WGP structure using a 405 nm laser source (wavelength/pitch = 20), while the minimum pitch resist grating is ∼24 nm (wavelength/pitch = 16.8).

Highlights

  • INTRODUCTIONScitation.org/journal/adv freedom associated with flexible substrates and nanofluidic surface interactions

  • Metrology is an essential aspect of nanoscale manufacturing because of the need to monitor procedures and provide process control

  • Two metrics are chosen to define the limits: the first is the comparison with experimental limits, that is, if the reflection difference for a 5% scaling variation is larger than the experimental noise floor, scatterometry has sufficient resolution to recover the metrology information; the second is the comparison with effective medium models, that is, if the simulated angular scatterometry signature differs from an effective medium model signature, again within experimental noise limits, scatterometry is judged to have sufficient resolution to determine the feature parameters

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Scitation.org/journal/adv freedom associated with flexible substrates and nanofluidic surface interactions.. The angle of incidence is varied, while a fixed wavelength source, usually a high brightness laser source, is used Both techniques have demonstrated resolution to feature sizes relevant to advanced manufacturing needs. A good agreement between the inferred structures from angular scatterometry measurements and destructive cross-section SEM images was obtained In this contribution, we extend the modeling for both sample types by scaling (1) the feature dimensions, keeping the period fixed, and (2) the feature dimensions and the pitch. Directions and opposite to the WGP conditions (TM polarization with a horizontal grating and TE polarization with a rotated, vertical grating, see Fig. 3) Since this is not a high reflectivity structure, the dynamic range issues evident in the WGP case are not significant

Noise level
Limitation for the WGP structure
Limitation for resist grating
Effective medium
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
WGP structure results—100 nm pitch
Resist results—130 nm pitch
Resist results—130–10 nm pitch variation
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.