Abstract

Fresh water is one of the most precious resources for our society. As a cause of oxygen depletion, organic pollutants released into water streams from industrial discharges, fertilizers, pesticides, detergents or consumed medicines can raise toxicological concerns due to their long-range transportability, bio-accumulation and degradation into carcinogenic compounds. The Stockholm Convention has named 21 persistent organic pollutants (POP) so far. As opposed to other separation techniques, adsorption, typically performed with activated carbons, offers opportunities to combine low operation costs with high performance as well as fast kinetics of capture if custom-designed with the right choice of adsorbent structure and surface chemistry. Nanofibers possess a higher surface to volume ratio compared to commercial macro-adsorbents, and a higher stability in water than other adsorptive nanostructures, such as loose nanoparticles. This paper highlights the potential of nanofibers in organic pollutant adsorption and thus provides an up-to-date overview of their employment for the treatment of wastewater contaminated by disinfectants and pesticides, which is benchmarked with other reported adsorptive structures. The discussion further investigates the impact of adsorbent pore geometry and surface chemistry on the resulting adsorption performance against specific organic molecules. Finally, insight into the physicochemical properties required for an adsorbent against a targeted pollutant is provided.

Highlights

  • Organic water pollution from synthesized chemical pesticides has been increasing over the past 50 years [1]

  • As phenol adsorption has been widely reported in the literature, phenol has been included in this study to benchmark the performance of nanofibers in the adsorption of phenolic compounds

  • Nanofiber-based materials showed their fast adsorption kinetics and required low adsorbent dose compared to benchmark adsorbents in this study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Organic water pollution from synthesized chemical pesticides has been increasing over the past 50 years [1]. Among common materials, activated carbons have been widely used against organic compounds and showed high adsorption capacities for a range of initial contamination varying between 15 μg/L and 80 mg/L as reported in the literature [4,14,15]. As phenol adsorption has been widely reported in the literature, phenol has been included in this study to benchmark the performance of nanofibers in the adsorption of phenolic compounds This inclusion allows for the investigation of the impact of the molecule chlorine number onto the adsorbent uptake. A comparison of the adsorptive performance pondered by the proportion range order between adsorbent dose and initial contaminant concentration was made here to help with the design of a cost-efficient material solution. Concerning kinetic models, pseudo firstand second-order, intra-particle diffusion and linear models were here reported

Moderately Hydrophobic Pesticides
Adsorbate Properties
H Bound Count
Impact of Adsorbent Specific and Contact Surface Area
Impact of Adsorbent Pore Size and Pore Volume
H4 ClOH
Impact of Adsorbent Pore Size
Impact of Adsorbent Surface Charge and Solution pH
Kinetic Performance of Nanofiber Adsorbents
Nanofiber
Persistent Organic Pollutants
Persistent
Adsorbate
Nanofibers for Pesticide
12 H10structures
17. Molecular of PCB
Adsorbent Regenerability
Findings
Recommendations and Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.