Abstract

Tooth wear induced by abrasive particles is a key process affecting dental function and life expectancy in mammals. Abrasive particles may be plant endogenous opal phytoliths, exogene wind-blown quartz dust or rain borne mineral particles ingested by mammals. Nano-indentation hardness of abrasive particles and dental tissues is a significant yet not fully established parameter of this tribological system. We provide consistent nano-indentation hardness data for some of the major antagonists in the dental tribosystem (tooth enamel, tooth dentine and opaline phytoliths from silica controlled cultivation). All indentation data were gathered from native tissues under stable and controlled conditions and thus maximize comparability to natural systems. Here we show that native (hydrated) wild boar enamel exceeds any hardness measures known for dry herbivore tooth enamel by at least 3 GPa. The native tooth enamel is not necessarily softer then environmental quartz grit, although there is little overlap. The native hardness of the tooth enamel exceeds that of any silica phytolith hardness recently published. Further, we find that native reed phytoliths equal native suine dentine in hardness, but does not exceed native suine enamel. We also find that native suine enamel is significantly harder than dry enamel and dry phytoliths are harder than native phytoliths. Our data challenge the claim that the culprit of tooth wear may be the food we chew, but suggest instead that wear may relates more to exogenous than endogenous abrasives.

Highlights

  • Teeth wear, because they contact each other or are abraded by particles ingested during feeding

  • We find that native suine enamel is significantly harder than dry enamel and dry phytoliths are harder than native phytoliths

  • When a rigid particle hits enamel, the latter can either be abraded by elastic/plastic chipping or displaced by a ‘standing wave’ moving ahead of the particle (Lucas et al 2013). These alternatives depend on particle geometry, friction, the shear stress and fracture toughness

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Because they contact each other or are abraded by particles ingested during feeding. Because wear cannot be avoided, abrasive particles ingested, largely impact tooth function and life expectancy (Carranza et al 2004, Carranza et al 2008, Ozaki et al 2009, Skogland 1988), and overall energy intake and chewing efficiency Reducing particle size of ingesta by mastication is considered a key adaptation in mammals (Clauss and Hummel 2005, Reilly et al 2001). Abrasives covering ingesta (e.g. wind or rain borne minerals, mostly quartz particles from the environment), and 3. While phytoliths immediately relate to the plant species eaten, dust and grit reflects the environment and its soil minerals as well as to climate driven atmospheric dust

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call