Abstract
This essay examines the philosophical and methodological implications of naming natural objects during the Enlightenment, in particular, the effect that different methods of nomenclature had upon scientific language. To frame this issue, I begin with the analysis of works by two famous philosophers of Enlightenment thought, Michel Foucault and Ernst Cassirer, as well as the work of the eighteenth-century botanist, Carolus Linnaeus. The questions about how to identify and order nature raised by these writers provide a structure for the central topic of this paper, the comte de Buffon’s use of nomenclature in his definition of species in the Histoire naturelle. Here, a species is not determined by the visible characteristics that differentiate it from others, but by how the naturalist perceives its relationship to the past and its activity through time. The resulting names embody the historical process through which they were designated, both by natural time and by the natural historian, Buffon.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.