Abstract

BackgroundLow malaria transmission in Namibia suggests that elimination is possible, but the risk of imported malaria from Angola remains a challenge. This case study reviews the early transition of a program shift from malaria control to elimination in three northern regions of Namibia that comprise the Trans-Kunene Malaria Initiative (TKMI): Kunene, Omusati, and Ohangwena.MethodsThirty-four key informant interviews were conducted and epidemiological and intervention data were assembled for 1995 to 2013. Malaria expenditure records were collected for each region for 2009, 2010, and 2011, representing the start of the transition from control to elimination. Interviews and expenditure data were analyzed across activity and expenditure type.ResultsIncidence has declined in all regions since 2004; cases are concentrated in the border zone. Expenditures in the three study regions have declined, from an average of $6.10 per person at risk per year in 2009 to an average of $3.61 in 2011. The proportion of spending allocated for diagnosis and treatment declined while that for vector control increased. Indoor residual spraying is the main intervention, but coverage varies, related to acceptability, mobility, accessibility, insecticide stockouts and staff shortages. Bed net distribution was scaled up beginning in 2005, assisted by NGO partners in later years, but coverage was highly variable. Distribution of rapid diagnostic tests in 2005 resulted in more accurate diagnosis and can help explain the large decline in cases beginning in 2006; however, challenges in personnel training and supervision remained during the expenditure study period of 2009 to 2011.ConclusionsIn addition to allocating sufficient human resources to vector control activities, developing a greater emphasis on surveillance will be central to the ongoing program shift from control to elimination, particularly in light of the malaria importation challenges experienced in the northern border regions. While overall program resources may continue on a downward trajectory, the program will be well positioned to actively eliminate the remaining foci of malaria if greater resources are allocated toward surveillance efforts.

Highlights

  • Low malaria transmission in Namibia suggests that elimination is possible, but the risk of imported malaria from Angola remains a challenge

  • While many countries in sub-Saharan Africa continue to scale-up malaria control measures [1], countries in Southern Africa are progressing toward elimination

  • The main vector in Namibia is Anopheles arabiensis, which is common in areas with lower rainfall [6]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Low malaria transmission in Namibia suggests that elimination is possible, but the risk of imported malaria from Angola remains a challenge. This case study reviews the early transition of a program shift from malaria control to elimination in three northern regions of Namibia that comprise the Trans-Kunene Malaria Initiative (TKMI): Kunene, Omusati, and Ohangwena. Since 2000, Namibia, South Africa, and Swaziland have all reduced malaria case incidence by more than 75%, and Botswana has relatively low malaria incidence as well [1]. Pockets of transmission remain, primarily in northern border areas where malaria receptivity remains high and vulnerability is greater due to continuous population movement from neighboring endemic countries [2,3]. Human migration from endemic to lower transmission areas can place destination countries at risk for malaria outbreaks or resurgence. Little is known about the types of program strategies and resource allocations required to reduce transmission in these vulnerable and highly porous border areas

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call