Abstract
The case of Synedra pelagica Hendey is discussed in terms of its nomenclature, the taxonomic implications of priority issues and its characterization. Application of replacement names for specific epithets is reasonably straightforward as it is governed by the ICN – conditions for valid publication of any taxonomic name can be satisfied even if no one can subsequently identify the taxon. The lack of clear diagnostic characters, as opposed to a description, can obscure what the name actually represents. These issues are briefly discussed with Synedra pelagica in mind.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
