Abstract

Four experiments are reported in which two harmonic tones (CS+ and CS−) were paired with a participant’s own name (SON) and different names (DN), respectively. A third tone was not paired with any other stimulus and served as a standard (frequent stimulus) in a three-stimuli oddball paradigm. The larger posterior positivity (P3) to SON than DN, found in previous studies, was replicated in all experiments. Conditioning of the P3 response was albeit observed in two similar experiments (1 and 3), but the obtained effects were weak and not identical in the two experiments. Only Experiment 4, where the number of CS/UCS pairings and the Stimulus-Onset Asynchrony between CS and UCS were increased, showed clear CS+/CS− differences both in time and time–frequency domains. Surprisingly, differential responses to CS+ and CS− were also obtained in Experiment 2, although SON and DN in that experiment were masked and never consciously recognized as meaningful words (recognition rate 0/63 participants). The results are discussed in the context of other ERP conditioning experiments and, particularly, the studies of non-conscious effect on ERP. Several further experiments are suggested to replicate and extend the present findings and to remove the remaining methodological limitations.

Highlights

  • Four experiments are reported in which two harmonic tones (CS+ and CS-) were paired with a participant’s own name (SON) and different names (DN), respectively

  • All participants reported after the experiment, that they had heard “two or three” different harmonic tones, and that at the beginning one of the tones was linked to their own name, and another tone, to other names

  • In the LTW, the amplitude was negative to DN but positive to SON at Cz and Pz, yielding a significant Stimulus x Site interaction: F(2,44) = 5.37, p

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Four experiments are reported in which two harmonic tones (CS+ and CS-) were paired with a participant’s own name (SON) and different names (DN), respectively. Having in mind the potential application in patients with severe brain damage, in the present study we intended to explore the effect of classical conditioning on ERP to simple stimuli. In which SON and a control stimulus (usually, a different name: DN) are presented as two rare stimuli, SON elicits a larger P3 component than DN (e.g., Perrin et al, 2006; Kotchoubey et al., 2004). We expected to obtain a similar effect in response to harmonic tones (presented as CS) paired with names

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.