NAM: Influential Lobby or Kiss of Death?

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessNAM: Influential Lobby or Kiss of Death?Richard W. GableRichard W. Gable Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Politics Volume 15, Number 2May, 1953 Sponsored by the Southern Political Science Association Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2307/2126059 Views: 11Total views on this site Citations: 17Citations are reported from Crossref PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:JENNIFER DELTON Who Tells Your Story: Contested History at the NAM, Enterprise & Society 21, no.11 (Aug 2019): 110–133.https://doi.org/10.1017/eso.2019.30Peter A. Swenson , Studies in American Political Development 32, no.11 ( 2018): 1.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898588X18000019Kyle Albert Labor Union Political Strategy in an Era of Decline and Revitalization, Sociological Inquiry 84, no.22 (Mar 2014): 210–237.https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12035 The United States, (Sep 2011): 70–104.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013284.004McGee Young The Political Roots of Small Business Identity, Polity 40, no.44 (Nov 2016): 436–463.https://doi.org/10.1057/pol.2008.20Kathleen A. Getz Public affairs and political strategy: theoretical foundations, Journal of Public Affairs 1, no.44 (Jan 2006): 305–329.https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.77Jonathan Soffer The National Association of Manufacturers and the Militarization of American Conservatism, Business History Review 75, no.44 (Dec 2011): 775–805.https://doi.org/10.2307/3116511Andrew A. Workman Creating the National War Labor Board: Franklin Roosevelt and the Politics of State Building in the Early 1940s, Journal of Policy History 12, no.22 (Feb 2012): 233–264.https://doi.org/10.1353/jph.2000.0016Andrew A. Workman Manufacturing Power: The Organizational Revival of the National Association of Manufacturers, 1941–1945, Business History Review 72, no.22 (Dec 2011): 279–317.https://doi.org/10.2307/3116279Lauren B. Edelman, Mark C. Suchman The Legal Environments of Organizations, Annual Review of Sociology 23, no.11 (Aug 1997): 479–515.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.479SVEIN S. ANDERSEN, KJELL A. ELIASSEN EU lobbying: The new research agenda, European Journal of Political Research 27, no.44 (Jun 1995): 427–441.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1995.tb00478.xGraham K. Wilson Business and Politics in the USA, (Jan 1990): 39–66.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21080-0_2Graham K. Wilson Business and Politics in the USA, (Jan 1985): 22–43.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17936-7_2David Knoke Power Structures, (Jan 1981): 275–332.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0498-3_5Alexander J. Groth USSR: Pluralist Monolith?, British Journal of Political Science 9, no.44 (Jan 2009): 445–464.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400001927Jennifer Delton The National Association of Manufacturers Helps Out, (): 194–224.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814051.008Robert A. Dahl Business and Politics: A Critical Appraisal of Political Science, American Political Science Review 53, no.11 (Sep 2013): 1–34.https://doi.org/10.2307/1951728